Monday, April 23, 2012

Green Card thru marriage — consequences of separation or divorce NPZ LAW GROUP, P.C. Attorneys Ridgewood New Jersey

Spouses of US citizens (USCs) and legal permanent residents (LPRs) (commonly referred to as “green card holders”) are entitled to seek permanent residence in most cases.
Spouse of USC
A spouse of a USC is categorized as an immediate relative. If the spouse of a USC is already in the United States   in legal status, then an immigrant visa petition and application for adjustment of status may be filed for the spouse with the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). In some cases, even if the spouse has no legal status in the United States, he/she may still be able to apply for adjustment of status based on the marriage to a USC under Section 245(a) or Section 245(i) of the Immigration & Nationality Act.
Spouse of LPR
Visa numbers for spouses of LPRs are not immediately available due to backlogs. Therefore, an immigrant visa petition must be filed with USCIS initially. If the spouse is in the United States and eligible for adjustment of status, an application for adjustment of status can be filed with the USCIS when the spouse’s priority date becomes current or the LPR sponsor becomes a naturalized United States citizen.
Eligibility requirements for adjustment of status
To be eligible for adjustment of status, the spouse and the USC or LPR must be married at the time of filing and adjudication of the I-485 application by USCIS. The marriage must be bona fide and the burden of proof rests with the applicant to prove the validity of the marriage. The key issue is whether the marriage was valid at its inception. To determine marriage validity at inception, USCIS looks at whether the spouses intended to establish a life together at the time of their marriage. USCIS can examine the behavior of the spouses both before and after the wedding to ascertain the intent to establish a life together. Such intent can be established through evidence of joint financial accounts, jointly titled property, creating beneficiary rights, sharing health and auto insurance, and creating children together.
Consequences of separation on an adjustment application
A problem arises if the spouses start living separately between the date of marriage and the date of the adjustment interview. Though separation can be a highly relevant factor in determining whether the marriage was bona fide or not, separation itself is not a bar to the approval of the adjustment application, if the spouses are able to justify that their marriage was valid at its inception.
The USCIS New York district office has a unique procedure for adjudicating spousal petitions where there are issues about the marriage being genuine. In such cases, a written notice describing the rights involved must be given to the petitioner, a separate attachment of the list of rights must be sent out with the interview appointment letter and a list of documents to be submitted at the time of the interview should be mailed to the petitioner. The interview may be conducted with both spouses present, or they may be separated and questioned in the presence of a video camera. The interview will feature questions concerning the personal living arrangements and marital situation of the spouses. Questions can range from the layout of furniture in the marital residence to the names of family members, friends, and pets, to product brand names used by the other spouse.
Although the Stokes procedure is only required in New York, USCIS has applied the basic concept to all marriage cases throughout the United States. A notice is sent to spouses in marriage cases advising them to bring certain documents to the interview, and it is now a routine to require spouse to provide at least some minimum proof about the bona fide nature of the marriage. Spouses usually are not separated and videotaped during the interviews unless USCIS has evidence indicating a sham marriage. When spouses are living separate and apart at the time of the interview, they may be more likely to find themselves in such a situation.
If the Stokes interview results in a denial of the petition for permanent residence, a person has the option to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which has jurisdiction over the visa petition. A new petition could also be filed, but the spouses may have to overcome the same issues that led to the denial of the first petition, including allegations of marital fraud.
Immigration proceedings
Adjustment applicants, who fail to appear for an adjustment interview, could be placed in proceedings. The beneficiary spouse would not be able to seek relief for adjustment, in cases where spouses have been living separately during the USCIS adjustment process and end up getting divorced by the time the immigration court is ready to hear the case.
In some situations, if the first marriage does not work out and a divorce occurs after USCIS denies adjustment; a new marriage to a more suitable candidate may be available. The spouse can file a new petition for permanent residence and application for adjustment of status based on the second marriage. How-ever, if the subsequent marriage occurs, while removal proceedings are pending, adjustment of status based on the marriage is not permitted, unless the spouses can prove the bona fide nature of the marriage by heightened clear and convincing evidence standard.
Conditional residence
Persons, who obtain permanent resident status based on their marriage to USC or LPR, are granted conditional resident status if the marriage is less than two years old at the time residence is granted. During the 90 days preceding the second anniversary of the grant of conditional residence, the conditional resident and the spouse are required to take steps to make the conditional status permanent. For this purpose, Form I-751 Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence has to be filed jointly by both spouses. Conditional residence is terminated if the conditional resident spouse fails to file the petition within the 90-day window or fails to appear for an interview.
However, if a conditional resident spouse’s marriage ends within the two year period, it is necessary to file for a waiver of the requirement that both spouses sign the petition. There are four types of waivers available and more than one waiver can be sought by the conditional resident spouse by providing supporting evidence.
·          Death and extreme hardship waivers — A conditional resident spouse may individually qualify for a joint petition waiver if the other spouse has died, or it can be shown that he or she would suffer extreme hardship if removed from the United States, only if such hardship occurred during the two-year conditional residence period.
·          lDivorce or annulment waiver — A conditional resident spouse can individually qualify for a waiver if it can be shown that the marriage was entered into in good faith, but the marriage was terminated by divorce or annulment prior to the filing of the joint petition. If the spouses are separated but not divorced prior to and during the three-month period designated for filing the joint petition, the conditional resident spouse cannot file the joint petition until a divorce is obtained. If the conditional resident spouse is in immigration court proceedings, a continuance may be sought to allow the divorce to become final.
·          Extremely cruelty waiver — A conditional resident spouse can individually qualify for a waiver if it can be shown that the marriage was entered into in good faith, but the applicant was battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by the US citizen or LPR spouse during the marriage. Evidence showing battery or extreme cruelty could include police reports documenting physical abuse, restraining orders, medical records, and other forms of psychological or emotional abuse.
However, if the USCIS denies the I-751 petition to remove conditions, the conditional resident spouse would receive a notice to appear in an immigration court for removal proceedings. The conditional resident spouse can request the Immigration Judge to adjudicate the petition. If the conditional residence has been terminated by USCIS and a waiver request was filed with USCIS but not adjudicated, the conditional resident spouse placed in removal proceedings can ask the Immigration Judge for a continuation until the waiver is adjudicated. A continuation can be obtained if the conditional resident spouse never filed a petition with USCIS and now seeks to do so.
VAWA: VAWA stands for “The Violence Against Women Act” and provides relief to certain spouses, who have experienced battery or abuse from USC or LPR spouses, including cancellation of removal or suspension of deportation. VAWA permits battered immigrant spouses to seek permanent residence without the assistance of the abusive spouses. In order to file a self-petition, a battered immigrant must have had a valid marriage to a USC or LPR; joint residence in the United States in most cases; spousal battery or extreme mental cruelty; and good moral character. A VAWA self-petition is filed on USCIS Form I-360. The most compelling part of the application is the battered immigrant’s own personal statement, typically submitted as an affidavit.

Friday, April 13, 2012

INCREASED EASE OF TRAVEL TO THE UNITED STATES HELPS BOLSTER JOBS FOR THE U.S. ECONOMY


President Obama continues to implement new initiatives to significantly increase travel and tourism in the United States. The U.S. tourism and travel industry is a substantial component of U.S. GDP and employment, representing 2.7% of GDP and 7.5 million jobs in 2010 - with international travel to the United States supporting 1.2 million jobs alone.
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, international travel resulted in $134 billion in U.S. exports in 2010 and is the nation's largest service export industry, with 7% of total exports and 24% of service exports. The Bureau of Economic Analysis estimates that every additional 65 international visitors to the United States can generate enough exports to support an additional travel and tourism-related job. According to the travel industry and Bureau of Economic Analysis, international travel is particularly important as overseas or "long-haul" travelers spend on average $4,000 on each visit. President Obama has stated: "Every year, tens of millions of tourists from all over the world come and visit America. And the more folks who visit America, the more Americans we get back to work. We need to help businesses all across the country grow and create jobs; compete and win. That's how we're going to rebuild an economy where hard work pays off, where responsibility is rewarded, and where anyone can make it if they try."
Travel and tourism is responsible for more then 1 million American jobs and it is clearly the case that more could be created over the next decade if the U.S. increases its share of the international travel market. Recent steps to liberalize the restrictions on travel to the U.S. offer important steps to bolster job creation by better promoting the U.S. as a tourism destination and improve secure visa processing. There have been and continue to be a series of recent initiatives by the Obama Administration to put Americans back to work and strengthen the U.S. economy.
The President seems to be focused on a national strategy to make the U.S. the world's top travel and tourism destination. This comes as part of a comprehensive effort to spur job creation. The number of travelers from emerging economies with growing middle classes - such as India, China, and Brazil - is projected to grow by 135%, 274%, and 50% by 2016. Nationals from these three (3) countries contributed approximately $15 billion dollars and thousands of jobs to the U.S. economy in 2010. In addition, Chinese, Indian and Brazilian tourists spend about $6,000 each trip, according to the Department of Commerce. The Department of State (DOS) has made progress in processing nonimmigrant visas from these key markets, allowing them to issue more than 7.5 million visas in the last fiscal year. This represents a 17% increase from the previous fiscal year. Improving visa processing capacity for India, China and Brazil is particularly important to spurn this growth.
One of the recent and key initiatives to increase tourism to the U.S., the DOS announced a new pilot program to waive the nonimmigrant visa interview requirement for certain visa renewals. Under the program, slated to run for two years, certain visa renewals that are more than 12 months but less than 48 months post-expiration will be eligible for renewal without a consular interview for the same visa category. The visa interview waiver is available to foreign nationals who have previously had their 10-print fingerprint scan collected; it will not be available to applicants who were previously denied a visa or who are listed in the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) or require a Security Advisory Opinion. Nor will the interview waiver be available to applicants who may have failed to comply with U.S. immigration laws or who are applying in a "high-threat" or "high-fraud" location. Only certain types of visas are eligible for this benefit.
Some additional initiatives have been announced that ease the travel to the U.S. The Obama Administration has been working to expand and make the Global Entry Program Permanent. Global Entry is a program within the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection that was created as a pilot in 2008 to facilitate expedited clearance for pre-approved, low-risk travelers upon arrival in the United States. Through the final rule, the Obama Administration has expanded and made the Global Entry program permanent. Due in part to innovative public-private partnerships, the Global Entry program now has more than 246,000 members, more than one million trusted travelers have Global Entry benefits, and efforts are underway to expand enrollment even further. There are currently 131 Global Entry kiosks at 20 airports and since launching, members have used Global Entry kiosks over 1.7 million times, saving CBP officers over 36,450 inspection hours-staff hours that CBP has then re-allocated to expedite regular passenger queues.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

H-1B SEASON UPDATE ABOUT VISA USAGE: H-1B Cap-Subject Petitions Received by USCIS.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Ridgewood, New Jersey - April 5, 2012 - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) informed stakeholders at the CSC/VSC engagement in Laguna Niguel, CA, on April 5th, 2012, that 22,323 cap-subject H-1B petitions have been received as of April 4th, 2012. Approximately 25% of these cases are for U.S. advanced degrees. According to USCIS, the number of filings received in the first few days of the H-1B season is almost double the number of filings received by USCIS during the same time last year. If you are considering an H-1B petition, do not delay. Consider filing your cap-subject H-1B visas as close to April 1st as you can. For additional information about the H-1B and/or its usage, please e-mail to us at info@visaserve.com.

Nachman, Phulwani, Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C.David H. Nachman, Esq. - Managing Attorney, U.S. Immigration Law Divisionemail: david_nachman@visaserve.comphone: 201-670-0006 (x100) 

H-1B AND INFAMOUS CAP GAP


The 2012 H-1B Season is Upon Us . . . Will This Year's Economy Bring a Lottery? At this juncture, it does not seem likely. However, as the statistics from last year show, planning for the H-1B is the key to being able to continue your authorized work status in the U.S. It need not be said, but it is always best to seek competent immigration legal counsel to be able to find a way to legally remain in authorized work status in the U.S.
Yes, it is that time of year again! We always hear the accountants moan and groan about the approaching April 15th deadline each year, but you have to listen a bit more closely and you will hear (and see) the U.S. business immigration lawyers and attorneys manifesting their continuing distaste for the April 1st filing date for cap-subject H-1B professional and specialty occupation workers. Well, here we go again . . .
April 1st, 2012 marks the first day when prospective H-1B petitioning employers and prospective H-1B employees will be able to apply to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) for Labor Condition Application (LCA) and H-1B visa petitions to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) for employment in the fiscal 2012-2013 year (FY 2012). Our advice to our H-1B employer clients continues to be that they need to think about filing H-1B petitions on (or very close to) April 1st for new and existing employees (usually international students in Optional Practical Training [OPT]) who will be eligible for first-time H-1B visas to begin their employment on or after October 1st, 2012.
By way of background, each Fiscal Year (FY), Congress has mandated an annual cap of 65,000 H-1B visas for "professional and specialty occupation workers" who possess the equivalence of a U.S. Bachelor's Degree. There are also an additional 20,000 H-1B visas available for individuals who possess the U.S. Master's Degree or other advanced degrees from U.S. Colleges or Universities.
Some cases are not subject to the cap. It continues to be the case that H-1B visa petitions filed on behalf of current workers who have been counted previously against the H-1B visa cap are not included in the annual cap established by Congress. Additionally, pursuant to the Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreement, 6,800 H-1B visas are available exclusively to Chile and Singapore Nationals. The Singapore/Chile numbers reduce the total allotment of H-1B visas available each fiscal year to 58,200.
For many years, our office has assisted international students who had to deal with the "cap-gap" issue. We also assist employers with E-Verify applications, so that they can offer international students who are working for them in Optional Practical Training (OPT) a 17-month STEM extension.
In 2008, there was a regulation that gave some assistance to international students in the U.S. who applied for H-1B in their OPT period. At that time, a regulation was promulgated that provided "cap-gap" relief for F-1 students with pending H-1B petitions. For example, F-1 student visa holders who received work authorization in OPT were permitted to extend the authorized period of stay and work authorization as long as they have received approved H-1B visas prior to the expiration of the OPT.
Also, many Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) students continue to use the STEM extension as a way to have the time they need to petition in the appropriate H-1B cycle. However, to get the STEM extensions, the employer needs to be enrolled in E-Verify.
For the last three (3) fiscal years, the H-1B allotment actually lasted for almost eight to nine months. This past year, the H-1B allocation lasted until the end of November. However, in some years past, the H-1B allotment was actually exhausted within three (3) days of the H-1B visas becoming available. This required the CIS to conduct a "lottery" and only one of three visas submitted was accepted for processing by the CIS. Those were scary times for individuals and companies seeking H-1Bs.
It is likely that the demand for H-1B visas this fiscal year may be greater than it was for last year. We keep hearing that "economic recovery" is on the way. For this reason, we continue to advise our H-1B employers to consider filing on April 1st, or as close to April 1st as possible.
Employers Feel the VIBE . . . Look Out For A New Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (VIBE).
CIS announced in its several recent stakeholders' meetings that it will continue to use a new web-based tool called the Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (VIBE). The VIBE program is purportedly designed to enhance the speed and accuracy for the adjudication of certain employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions.
The U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (CIS) has implemented the Validation Instrument for Business Enterprises (VIBE) Program in the process of adjudicating certain employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions, including H-1B.
The VIBE Program uses public information and previously accumulated data by third party provides to validate data about the organizations that file petitions for the temporary and permanent employment of foreign national workers in the U.S.
The VIBE Program allows CIS to electronically "ping" databases. One such database is Dun & Bradstreet (D&B). The D&B database contains information about the petitioner organization including, but not limited to:
1. Business activities, such as type of business (North American Industry Classification System code), trade payment information, and status (active or inactive);
2. Financial standing, including sales volume and credit standing;
3. Number of employees, including onsite and globally;
4. Relationships with other entities including foreign affiliates;
5. Status, for example, whether it is a single entity, branch, subsidiary, or headquarters;
6. Ownership and legal status, such as LLC, partnership or corporation;
7. Company executives;
8. Date of establishment as a business entity; and
9. Current physical address.
The idea is that a CIS adjudicator will consider the information submitted by the H-1B petitioner and also compare that information to the information that they glean from the VIBE database.
Since the VIBE database is not fully populated, it is likely that H-1B petitions will continue to be met with requests for evidence (RFEs), when the H-1B petitions are submitted to the CIS. The receipt by an employer of an RFE is likely to cause delays in processing of the H-1B (even when the cases are submitted with premium processing requests).
As an aside, the CIS also announced that it is working on an electronic registration for H-1B employers to attempt to more streamline the process and to avoid the "run on cap-subject H-1Bs" that has occurred in prior years.
The CIS announced a proposed rule that would establish a system which will allow an H-1B employer to submit an electronic registration prior to the submission of the H-1B. The idea behind the registration is that before April 1st, the CIS will be able to predict how many visas are being demanded by cap-subject H-1B employers/employees. The implementation of this system is still in its genesis.
Other important issues in the H-1B arena that employers need to know about include:
(1) that CIS announced a review of its policy on H-1B cap exemptions for nonprofit entities that are related to or affiliated with institutions of higher education (examples include teaching hospitals that are affiliated with medical schools or organizations affiliated with nonprofit colleges or universities); and
(2) that U.S. employers seeking to sponsor foreign nationals on H-1B, H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore), L-1, and O-1A visas must certify to compliance with Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).
VISA BULLETIN FOR MARCH 2012
The following information is provided by the Visa Office regarding the cut-off dates for the month ofMarch 2012.
FAMILY PREFERENCES
F1-Family first preference: Unmarried sons and daughters over the age of 21 years of U.S. Citizens. The cut-off date has moved forward by five (5) weeks for most of the countries including India toFebruary 1, 2005.
F2A - Family second preference: Spouses and minor children, and unmarried sons and daughters of permanent residents. The cut-off date has moved forward by six (6) weeks for most of the countries including India to July 22, 2009.
F2B- Family second preference: Unmarried sons and daughters over 21 of permanent residents. The cut-off date has moved forward by four (4) weeks for most of the countries including India toNovember 15, 2003.
F3-Family third preference: Married sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens and their spouses and children. The cut-off date has moved forward by four (4) weeks for most of the countries includingIndia to January 1, 2002.
F4-Family fourth preference: Brothers and sisters of U.S. Citizens. The cut-off date has moved forward by four (4) weeks for most of the countries including India to October 8, 2000.
EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCES
EB1 - Priority Workers: The cut-off date for this category for all countries including Indiais CURRENT.
EB2 - Advanced Degree holders: The cut-off date for this category for most countries isCURRENTand for India it has moved forward by four (4) months to May 1, 2010.
EB3 - Professional Skilled Workers: The cut-off date for this category has moved forward by three (3) weeks to March 15, 2006 for most of the countries and for India it has moved forward by one (1) week to August 22, 2002.
EB3 - Other Workers: The cut-off date for this category has moved forward by three (3) weeks toMarch 15, 2006 for most of the countries and for India it has moved forward by one (1) week toAugust 22, 2002.
EB4 (Certain Special Immigrants), EB4 (Certain Religious Workers), EB5 (Targeted Employment Areas)EB5 (Pilot Programs) are CURRENT for all countries includingINDIA.

HUMANITARIAN PAROLE


U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) provides a number of humanitarian programs and types of protection for individuals in need of shelter and/or aid from disasters, oppression, emergency medical issues and other urgent conditions. Humanitarian parole is one such program.
Humanitarian parole enables an otherwise Inadmissible individual to enter the U.S. temporarily due to a compelling emergency. USCIS may grant humanitarian parole based on urgent, compelling reasons, or to promote a significant public benefit. This parole does not confer any permanent immigration status, but does enable a recipient to apply for and receive employment authorization.
Humanitarian parole is typically granted for the duration of the emergency or compelling situation at issue. Anyone granted humanitarian parole must depart the U.S. prior to its expiration date or risk being placed in removal proceedings. An individual paroled into the United States, however, may request that a period of humanitarian parole be extended. Anyone can file an application for humanitarian parole, including the prospective parolee, a sponsoring relative, an attorney, or any other interested individual or organization. Requests for humanitarian parole may only be accepted for individuals who are outside the U.S.; unless such request pertains to a re-parole of a prior humanitarian parole granted at USCIS headquarters in Washington, D.C.
Q. Where can I find the law about humanitarian parole?
The legal foundation for humanitarian parole comes from the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Section 212(d)(5)(A) of the INA states USCIS has discretion to parole an individual into the U.S. temporarily under certain conditions for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit on a case-by-case basis.
Where do I file a request for humanitarian parole?
A. You file a request for humanitarian parole using Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, with the Form I-134,
Affidavit of Support, to:
For U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Deliveries:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
P.O. Box 660865
Dallas, TX 75266
For Express mail and Courier Deliveries:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
Attn: HP
2501 S. State Hwy 121, Business
Suite 400
Lewisville, TX 75067
How long does it take to adjudicate an application?
A. Humanitarian parole applications are generally adjudicated within 90-120 business days from the time USCIS receives the application.
How can I find out the status of my application?
A. To check the status of your application, contact the Chief of the Humanitarian Affairs Branch at the above address.
Please provide specific information about your application, such as the case number of the humanitarian parole application, the name, and date of birth of the petitioner, the date of application, and a brief explanation of the reasons for seeking parole.
Q. Can USCIS adjudicate humanitarian parole applications for individuals currently in the United States?
Requests for humanitarian parole can only be accepted for individuals who are currently outside the U.S. However, where USCIS Headquarters has already granted parole for humanitarian reasons, an individual in the U.S. may file a request to for re-parole.
Q. How will I be notified if my request is approved?
If you are the applicant, you will receive a written notice when your application has been adjudicated.
Q. For what period of time will I be granted humanitarian parole?
Humanitarian parole is typically granted for the duration of the emergency or compelling situation at issue. It is seldom granted for longer than one year.
Q. What can I do if my case is not approved?
The denial of a request for humanitarian parole is a discretionary determination based upon a complete review of all of the circumstances described in the documents submitted in each case. The law does not provide for appeal of a denial. However, if there are significant new facts that are relevant to your application for humanitarian parole, you may submit a new Form I-131 to the address above with a new fee and supporting documentation.
Guidelines
A Humanitarian Parole application package should contain ALL of the following:
- Original Form I-131, Application for Travel Document
- Original Form I-134, Affidavit of Support
-Filing fee
- Detailed explanation of the reasons why you are applying for Humanitarian Parole and the length of time for which you need Humanitarian Parole (the maximum time is usually limited to one year)
- Detailed explanation of why you cannot obtain a U.S. nonimmigrant visa from the Department of State including: when and where you attempted to obtain visas,
- if you were denied, send a copy of the denial letter given to you
- Detailed explanation of the reasons why you cannot obtain any required waiver of inadmissibility (if applicable) and a copy of the denial letter if you received one
- Copies of any previously approved immigrant petitions (Forms I-130, I-140, I-360)
- Copies of supporting documents (tax returns,doctor's letters, etc) can also be referred to as evidence.
Important Notes: MEDICAL PAROLE: If you need humanitarian parole for medical reasons, you must submit an explanation from a medical doctor stating the diagnosis, prognosis, the reasons why you cannot obtain treatment in your home country or in a neighboring country, how long the treatment is expected to last, how the treatment will be paid for, and the overall, estimated cost of the treatment.

EOIR Statement Regarding Second Stage of Case-by-Case Review Pursuant to DHS's Prosecutorial Discretion Initiative


On March 30, 2012 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the next phase of its case-by-case review launched in November 2011. Under the initiative, DHS is reviewing the pending immigration removal caseload to determine in which cases it will exercise prosecutorial discretion. DHS conducted a pilot program with a focused review of pending non-detained cases in the Baltimore and Denver immigration courts from December 4, 2011 to January 13, 2012. To assist this effort, EOIR rescheduled cases with hearings in the non-detained dockets in these courts during this period.
Continuing the effort to support DHS's case-by-case review, the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) has agreed to temporarily and partially suspend non-detained dockets in seven additional immigration courts over four two-week periods. As with the initial effort piloted in Baltimore and Denver, EOIR intends to reschedule cases on the non-detained dockets of the following courts in the coming months: Detroit, New Orleans, Orlando, and Seattle from April 23 until May 4; New York from May 7 until May 18; San Francisco from June 4 until June 15; and Los Angeles from July 9 until July 20. Those immigration judges whose non-detained dockets are affected will hear cases on detained dockets during the relevant period. EOIR will issue hearing notices to all respondents whose cases are rescheduled.
DHS attorneys will continue to make the decisions regarding prosecutorial discretion, and immigration judges will remain prepared to adjudicate motions to administratively close or terminate cases on a case-by-case basis as they are filed with the court.

Advance Copy of Proposed Rule: Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives

"On January 9, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced its intention to change its current process for filing and adjudication of certain applications for waivers of inadmissibility filed in connection with an immediate relative immigrant visa application. USCIS now proposes to amend its regulations to allow certain immediate relatives of U.S. citizens who are physically present in the United States to request provisional unlawful presence waivers under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (INA or Act), prior to departing from the United States for consular processing of their immigrant visa applications. Currently, such aliens must depart from the United States and request waivers of inadmissibility during the overseas immigrant visa process, often causing U.S. citizens to be separated for extended periods from their immediate relatives who are otherwise eligible for an immigrant visa and admission for lawful permanent residence. Under the proposal, USCIS would grant a provisional unlawful presence waiver that would become fully effective upon the alien's departure from the United States and the U.S. Department of State (DOS) consular officer's determination at the time of the immigrant visa interview that, in light of the approved provisional unlawful presence waiver and other evidence of record, the alien is otherwise admissible to the United States and eligible to receive an immigrant visa. USCIS does not envision issuing Notices to Appear (NTA) to initiate removal proceedings against aliens whose provisional waiver applications have been approved. However, if USCIS, for example, discovers acts, omissions, or post-approval activity that would meet the criteria for NTA issuance or determines that the provisional waiver was granted in error, USCIS may issue an NTA, consistent with USCIS's NTA issuance policy, as well as reopen the provisional waiver approval and deny the waiver request. USCIS anticipates that the proposed changes will significantly reduce the length of time U.S. citizens are separated from their immediate relatives who are required to remain outside of the United States for immigrant visa processing and during adjudication of a waiver of inadmissibility for the unlawful presence. USCIS also believes that the proposed process, which reduces the degree of interchange between the DOS and USCIS, will create efficiencies for both the U.S. Government and most applicants. In addition to codifying the new process, USCIS proposes amendments clarifying other regulations. Even after USCIS begins accepting provisional unlawful presence waiver applications, the filing or approval of a provisional unlawful presence waiver application will not: confer any legal status, protect against the accrual of additional unlawful presence, authorize an alien to enter the United States without securing a visa or other appropriate entry document, convey any interim benefits (e.g., employment authorization, parole, or advance parole), or protect an alien from being placed in removal proceedings or removed from the United States. Do not send an application requesting a provisional waiver under the procedures under consideration in this proposed rule. Any provisional waiver application filed before the rule becomes final and effective will be rejected and the application package returned to the applicant, including any fees. USCIS will begin accepting provisional waiver applications only after a final rule is issued and the procedural change becomes effective."

U.S. VISAS AND IMMIGRATION - INTERVIEW WITH CBP (CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION)

Attorneys Michael Phulwani and Madhavi Samudrala interview Mr. Kevin Donohue, Deputy Chief, Criminal Enforcement, CBP (Customs and Border Protection). Officer Kevin Donohue provides information about the procedures at Newark International Airport, NJ including entry procedures and inspection of international travelers, required documents, inadmissibility issues, etc.